by Jeffrey Tucker
I’ve just left the Liberty Forum in New Hampshire, a three-day gathering of hundreds of people who are trying to find ways of living freer lives in times of despotic control. Among many things, this might be the world center for exhibiting monies of the future.
I leave as the proud owner of three types of nonpaper, nongovernmental monies. They operate in competition with the government’s dollar. Yes, these include Bitcoin, the mind-blowing digital currency that has techno-geeks, edgy global traders, and even the World Bank buzzing about its potential to finally separate money from the state.
Why are people working on alternative forms of money? It’s all about escaping a 100-year-old trend. Back in the day, the dollar was a name for gold, not just a paper ticket manufactured by a government-chartered central bank.
Depression, war, and deliberate debasement have left us with a dollar that is a mere shadow of its former self. It keeps losing value, of course, rather than gaining value as it would in a free market.
Just as critically, the dollar today serves as the enabler of all regulatory control over our economic lives. Using the dollar means dragging a gigantic and burdensome machinery along with you. It means tens of thousands of regulatory controls, government spying, confiscatory taxation, and endless burdens that are bad for businesses and individuals.
Ideally, the dollar would be totally reformed, made good as gold, and restored to its former integrity. How likely is that to happen? The whole idea depends on the wisdom, good will, and public beneficence of the political and elite class of banking moguls.
Is there any wonder that there is a clamor for the private sector to come up with something new? It’s been going on for several decades now, this discovery process we might call “monetary entrepreneurship.”
People in ancient days had to discover the best commodities to get progress beyond mere barter. What would best serve as money: something to acquire not to consume, but to trade for other things to consume? Is it salt? Shells? Silver and gold? Many options are available, and only the best money can win the market competition over time.
Something like this is taking place again today. Government money is risky, carries too much cost, and has an uncertain future to it. People put up with it for convenience and because nothing better seems to present itself.
There is a real opportunity here for monetary entrepreneurs to get to work coming up with something new and letting the markets try it out. Over the last 10 years, governments have shot down a number of experiments in private money that used digital networks to monetize gold and silver. It’s been a brutal job to retain the government’s money monopoly.
Entrepreneurs have learned. New monetary instruments have to protect themselves against government attempts to shoot them down in obvious ways. There are three general ways to do this: back to the basics with precious metals, onward to the future with purely digital money, and some combination of both of these.
My first acquisition is an innovative way to save and spend smaller units of silver. The tiny bars are pretty and clearly mark their weight. Today, each one is worth about $1. In the future they could be worth much more. For daily spending needs for cabs, food, and water, these would work quite well.
It’s true that they are pretty small and might get lost in your pocket. You have to have some pretty nimble fingers to handle them in a hurry. And even young eyes might need reading glasses to discern the weight.
A solution to this problem comes from Shire Silver and entrepreneur Ron Helwig. It’s a simple, but ingenious idea, one he is very anxious to share with others. He takes various strands of gold and silver of many weights and laminates them in a credit-card size monetary instrument.
The result is convenient and easy to carry and spend. He is not the only maker of these cards. Many others are picking up the idea — a fact that makes Mr. Helwig very pleased (he is the last one to attempt to gain a government monopoly through a copyright, patent, or trademark).
Shire Silver cards are commonly accepted all over New Hampshire. But they are in use all over the world. Helwig gets orders from New Zealand, Brazil, and even Japan. Some orders are valued as low as $6, but he receives orders valued at $5,000 too. At the Liberty Forum, he couldn’t keep up with the demand, so he brought his machine to the booth. He even let me make a 1-gram card myself!
While I sat at the Shire Silver booth, people were also purchasing cards with Bitcoins. This is the first time I had seen Bitcoins in operation as real money. In fact, most things were available in Bitcoins. Here we have a currency created only in 2009, and already it is making possible global transactions every one or two seconds with someone somewhere in the world.
I downloaded a smartphone application called Blockchain.info that gave me a wallet of Bitcoins. I’ve been curious about this whole phenomenon, but there is nothing like owning the currency yourself to underscore the point.
I was able to sit and talk with some of the major players in this emergent industry and gain a clearer understanding of what it is and what it is about. As a result, I’m pretty confident that this is the real the thing and has a spectacular future.
I went over to the Bitcoin ATM machine and loaded up while I could. Of course, you can also buy them online (there are many options, but try bitstamp.net or buy them locally from localbitcoins.com), but in person, you can get digits for cash, which is especially nice. The trading relationships between Bitcoin and government currency are always in operation, so there is never a doubt about the value of your portfolio.
A year ago, there were more skeptics than there are today. And this is because the market is expanding. There are websites that accept only Bitcoins, such as Silk Road. I also met many people who are paid their normal salaries almost exclusively in Bitcoins. There are companies planning to go public in Bitcoins, which thereby means completely bypassing the SEC and the whole regulatory apparatus.
As you can see, we are really talking about the emergence of a countereconomy, a free-market universe that runs parallel to the dollar-based economy.
Skeptics say: “But I can’t use any of these monetary instruments to pay rent, buy a car, or get groceries.” Well, that’s because these ideas are all ventures that take time to develop. Money is like any other good: It begins with speculation and goes through a period of gradual adoption until it is universal.
Phones were not universally useful until many people had them. It was the same with email. When I first saw an email address, I thought: That’s the silliest thing ever, because who will even write this guy? Eventually, the network grew and reached the critical mass and the government’s system of mail delivery took a massive hit for the first time ever.
Why wait for monetary reform to come from the top? If the market wants a better-quality money, one that frees markets and makes economic exchange more beneficial, markets will create it out of existing resources and realities. This can even happen when government objects. Government can only defy human desires for so long before people decide that the costs of compliance outweigh the benefits.
The government’s money monopoly is crucial to its control over society. What happens when that comes to an end? Imagine the future.
Originally published by Laissez Faire Books. Used with the author’s permission.
Jeffrey Tucker is editorial director of the American Institute for Economic Research. He is also CEO of the Atlanta Bitcoin Embassy, a managing partner of Vellum Capital, CLO of Liberty.me, Distinguished Honorary Member of Mises Brazil, economics adviser to FreeSociety.com, research fellow at the Acton Institute, policy adviser of the Heartland Institute, founder of the CryptoCurrency Conference, member of the editorial board of the Molinari Review, and author of eight books. In addition to 8 books, he has written 150 introductions to books and many thousands of articles appearing in the scholarly and popular press.